data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f8f1/4f8f11d62092132bb57eeb04ed9b045abf9eeeb2" alt="lgtbaner.gif (12718 bytes)"
Previous
Questions and Answers
Should churches
use something evil like the Internet to reach people?
One could argue that you are using an
"evil" tool in this web page. Honestly, most of the internet is pornography but
you have seen fit to use it as a tool to reach people.
As you will notice, most of this web site is
simply giving the Word of God, calling people to repentance. We do not emphasize pictures,
video clips, fancy computer graphics, etc. The most striking thing about this web site is
not its high tech appearance, but its simple, old-fashioned, warning that people
need to get right with God, and that they need to recognize the fads of this
present hour as error.
Anything can be
used for evil, including web sites. But, like with money, it is not money that is the root
of all evil, it is the love of it. I Timothy 6:10 says, For the LOVE of money
is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith,
and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. People use guns for evil (to
murder people), and guns for good (to protect nations). People use cars for evil (to get
away from a bank robbery), and cars for good (to take someone to the hospital). Even so it
is with web sites. People can use them for evil (pornography), and for good (giving the
Word of God).
Although there
is a lot of evil on the Internet (and I wish that the government would shut down those
sites), I doubt that your statement is true, Honestly, most of the internet is
pornography
When you take into account all of the businesses that now operate
on the Internet, as well as the multitude of personal pages out there, I think that
pornography sites are not nearly the majority out there. I think that they are like the
sodomites in our country not the majority, but trying to push their message as
though they were. I have no proof, and certainly I am not going to personally check it
out, but I have an idea that the pornography sites are also in the vast minority, but seem
the majority, because they illegally send out vast amounts of spam email. If churches used
the same illegal tactics, people would think that the vast majority of web sites on the
Internet are church sites, but that, also, would not be the case. I say that because
we would never pay money to be on something that was dedicated to immorality.
When I was in
Bible College, a visiting speaker told of how he advertises the gospel in newspapers and
secular magazines around the world. He then turned to our pastor and said, And I
would like to see Dr. ___________ put an advertisement in Playboy magazine. Our
pastor immediately said, No sir! And our pastor was right. By paying to
advertise in that wicked magazine, he would be helping to keep it going. If we really
thought that the Internet was mostly evil, we would not be paying for access to get on it.
That is the same reason that we will not pay money for time on secular or Christian rock
stations to preach the gospel. By paying for time on those stations, we are helping to
keep them on the air, and causing people to keep tuning in to those stations. That is like
paying a bartender for 30 minutes to preach the gospel in his bar. Are there sinners
there? Yes. But by paying him money, it is helping to keep his bar open, and actually
encouraging people to come back to it. There is a way to reach sinners, without actually
furthering their sin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6453a/6453a24a49317bb19e524f07ba8e444855f1ebd1" alt="FlagLine.gif (1691 bytes)"
Previous Questions and Answers
Ask
A Question