
Previous Questions and Answers
Should
churches practice "open," "closed," or "close" communion?
I have one last question for you and hope you know that I am not asking to
criticize but to test stereotypes I have been taught. Do you as a pastor practice open,
closed, or close communion? I look forward to your reply and maintain more than ever that
you have one of if not the most scriptural web site I have found.
The following definitions of Communion may vary
somewhat, depending upon whom you ask. The definition of "Closed Communion" is
"the Lords Supper is restricted to only members of that particular local
church, who are in good standing with the church and with the Lord." The definition
of "Close Communion" is "only members of that local church, and visitors
from churches of like faith and practice, who are saved and baptized, may partake of the
Lords Supper." "Open Communion" is defined as "anyone in the
service who is saved may partake of the Lords Supper," or some have defined it
as "anyone who says that they love Jesus, may partake."
I
Corinthians 11:17-34 says, "Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not,
that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all, when ye
come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly
believe it. For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be
made manifest among you. When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to
eat the Lord's supper. For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one
is hungry, and another is drunken. What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or
despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall
I praise you in this? I praise you not. For I have received of the Lord that which also I
delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took
bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body,
which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took
the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do
ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and
drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat
this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and
blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and
drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh
damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and
sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be
judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be
condemned with the world. Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one
for another. And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto
condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come."
The first requirement to
partaking of the Lords Supper is that a Christian must be right with his fellow
believers. "Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come
together not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all, when ye come together in
the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. For there
must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among
you."
The
Lords Supper is to be preceded by a time of self-examination and willingness to
repent of sin and ask forgiveness. But that requires that we also search our hearts and
see if we are not forgiving others for where they may have wronged us. We need to take
care of those matters first. Matthew 6:14,15 says, "For if ye forgive men their
trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their
trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses". Matthew 5:23,24 says,
"Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy
brother hath ought against thee; Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way;
FIRST BE RECONCILED TO THY BROTHER, and then come and offer thy gift."
The second
requirement mentioned naturally follows: it is a time for reverence, and a time for
courtesy in regard to the other people present in the service. "When ye come together
therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper. For in eating every one
taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What? have
ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that
have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not."
The
Lords Supper is not a time to selfishly think about oneself, but to be courteous of
others. It is not a time to greedily gobble down the food and drink, but to prayerfully
meditate upon the meaning of those elements. It is a time to be sober and reverent.
We can
contrast this attitude with that of the Pharisees. Luke 18:10-14 says, "Two men went
up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. The Pharisee
stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are,
extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I
give tithes of all that I possess. And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up
so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me
a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for
every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be
exalted."
When we
partake of the Lords Supper, we are not to be thinking of how great and spiritual we
are, and how lowly and unspiritual others in the service may be. Our attitudes are to be
quite the opposite. I am afraid that in churches with "Closed Communion,"
visitors in the service may very well feel like they are the publicans, and the church
members are the Pharisees.
The next
section deals with the actual handing out of the elements and the meaning of them.
"For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord
Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he
brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in
remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying,
This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in
remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the
Lord's death till he come."
It is sad
today that companies are making it too convenient for churches, because it is
causing them to be unscriptural. Companies make nice little square or round unleavened
crackers for use in the Lords Supper. But they do not picture the Lords BROKEN
BODY for us, any more than sprinkling for baptizing pictures death, burial, and
resurrection. The unleavened bread needs to be broken to give the right picture of how
Jesus suffered for us.
The same is true of the
cup. The fruit of the vine, grape juice, is what was used by the Lord. A popular radio
preacher made light of the fact of observing the Lords Supper in a jail cell with a
prisoner using potato chips and Coke. Grape juice is not blood (nor does it turn into the
literal blood of Christ, like the Catholics teach. The Bible forbids us to drink blood.
Genesis 9:4 says, "But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall
ye not eat.") But grape juice is used because it does have the appearance of
blood. It is a deep, dark red, like blood. Genesis 49:11 says, "Binding his foal unto
the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his
clothes in THE BLOOD OF GRAPES."
The Lord
commands us to periodically partake of those elements, "in remembrance of Him."
He does not say how often we are to observe the Lords Supper, but that when we do,
we are to do it in this certain manner. So it is up to the local church as to how often
they want to observe the Lords Supper.
The next
section deals with a person being truly born again, and truly willing to judge sin in his
life. "Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord,
unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine
himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and
drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's
body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would
judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the
Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world."
Eating of
the bread or drinking of the cup "unworthily" is defined as "being guilty
of the body and blood of the Lord." If a person is not truly saved, then he is
partaking of the elements, but really despising what the Lord did for him on the cross. If
he did not despise what Christ did, then he would receive the Lord as his Savior. If a
Christian partakes of the elements, but is not willing to judge sin in his life, then he
is also despising what Jesus went through to save us from our sin. He knows full well how
Jesus suffered because of our sin; but if he continues right on in sin with no remorse,
then it shows that he does not really care that Jesus had to suffer and die for us.
This is
the passage that goes into the greatest detail of instructions in regard to the
Lords Supper, and you will notice that THE EMPHASIS IS UPON A MAN EXAMINING HIMSELF
NOT THE CHURCH EXAMINING THOSE ASSEMBLED THERE. Verse 28 says, "But let a man
examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup." You will
notice that the church is not held accountable for those who partake, as to whether they
are worthy or not. It is the individual person that is held accountable. Verses 30,31 say,
"For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would
judge ourselves, we should not be judged." CLOSED COMMUNION turns that emphasis
around the other way THE CHURCH IS DOING THE JUDGING AS TO WHO IS WORTHY OF
PARTAKING. But the Scripture is very clear that it is not the pastor or deacons who are
judged, if unworthy people go ahead and partake of the Lords Supper it is the
individuals themselves who will get sick or die.
There are
only two scriptural offices of the local church; pastor, and deacons. And the Bible only
gives us two ordinances of the local church; baptism, and the Lords Supper. This
matter about "Closed Communion" reminds me of an incident that took place in a
Baptist church. A boy was visiting the church, and got saved. He wanted to be baptized,
but the church leaders would not baptize him. The reason they gave was, "The boy is
just visiting, and he will obviously not be going to church here. So he just needs to find
a church near his home who will baptize him." When I heard what happened, I could
hardly believe my ears, that a Baptist church would refuse to help someone obey the Lord
in the first command after being saved to be baptized.
Acts
8:35,36 says, "Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and
preached unto him Jesus. And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water:
and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?" What
did Philip say? "I am sorry, Mr. Eunuch, but after today, I will probably never see
you again, because you are going back to Ethiopia, and I am going to be taking flight to
Azotus, very shortly. What you need to do is find a church, when you get back home, that
will baptize you. You will obviously not be going to church with me, so I do not want to
baptize you."
Is that what Philip said?
No! Philip was an ordained deacon, as we have seen, and he gladly helped the Ethiopian
eunuch obey the Lord in believers baptism. Acts 8:37-40 says, "And Philip said,
If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe
that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they
went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him. And when
they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the
eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing. But Philip was found at Azotus:
and passing through he preached in all the cities, till he came to Caesarea."
The first
thing that a Christian is commanded to do after he gets saved, is to be baptized. In Acts
16:25,26, we see Paul and Silas in jail, "And at midnight Paul and Silas prayed, and
sang praises unto God: and the prisoners heard them. And suddenly there was a great
earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken: and immediately all the
doors were opened, and every one's bands were loosed." They had been singing at
midnight, and God sent an earthquake that opened all the jail doors and all the bands on
the prisoners were loosed.
The
earthquake woke up the jailor, and when he saw the situation, he was ready to kill
himself, but Paul called out to stop him. In verses 29-33 we read, "Then he called
for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas, And
brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on
the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. And they spake unto him the
word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house. And he took them the same hour of the
night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway."
Notice
that Paul did not tell the jailor, "I am sorry, Mr. Jailor, but after tonight, I may
never see you again. I am not going to baptize you, because you will certainly not be
going to my church. You just go find a church around here that will baptize you."
That would have been causing the jailor to disobey the first command of the Lord to a new
believer. So Paul gladly baptized him the same hour of the night.
Why do I
bring up the matter of baptism when we are supposed to be talking about the Lords
Supper? Because they are the two ordinances of the local church that we are told to
observe. If a local church will ONLY baptize new converts that will definitely be members
of their church in their locality (and staying there), then they are disobeying the Word
of God, because they are hindering the growth of new Christians. If a new Christian wants
to follow the Lords command and get baptized, then we should rejoice and gladly
baptize him or her!
In the
same way, the Lords Supper is also an ordinance of the local church. IF THE BIBLE
TELLS CHRISTIANS TO OBSERVE THE LORDS SUPPER IN REMEMBRANCE OF HIM, BUT IF THE LOCAL
CHURCH REFUSES TO ALLOW SOMEONE WHO IS BORN AGAIN TO PARTAKE, JUST BECAUSE IT IS NOT THEIR
HOME CHURCH, IS THAT HELPING CHRISTIANS OBEY THE LORD, OR DISOBEY HIM? I Corinthians
11:23-26 says, "For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you,
That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had
given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you:
this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had
supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink
it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do
show the Lord's death till he come."
In our
church, we observe the Lords Supper every other month. We do not follow any man-made
definition, but I suppose that some would classify us as practicing "Close
Communion." We carefully read and explain I Corinthians 11:17-34. It gives
people the opportunity to understand that they must be saved, and willing to judge sin in
their lives. If they do not, then it gives them a strong warning about the judgment of
God. We also bring up the matter of baptism, that if a Christian is unwilling to get
baptized, then he should not partake, because that is Gods first command to a new
Christian. If a Christian is unwilling to get baptized, then there is sin in that
Christians life. To go any farther with restrictions, is to go farther than the
Bible goes.
Please notice how Paul
ends his instruction in verse 34, "And the rest will I set in order when I
come." He was definitely talking about any further problems with the Lords
Supper would be dealt with by him, personally, when he came to see them. Obviously, then,
Paul was going to observe the Lords Supper with them when he came. If "Closed
Communion" was actually the correct position, then Paul would not have been able to
observe the Lords Supper with the Corinthians. He may have been used of God to begin
that work there, but Paul was not a member of that local church Corinth was not his
home. That would put that church in the ridiculous position of denying Paul to observe the
Lords Supper with them.
The whole
context of the Lords Supper is surrounded by "others." It starts by
directing their attention to the needs of others (verse 21), and it closes by mentioning
thoughtfulness and courtesy for others (verse 33). Are we not commanded to love the
brethren? John 13:34,35 says, "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one
another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know
that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another." Does that just mean the
other Christians who are members of our local church? Of course not. It would include
Christians who visit in our services as well.
Offering
food and drink to others is a practice of courtesy taught throughout the Old and New
Testaments. Hebrews 13:1,2 says, "Let brotherly love continue. Be not forgetful to
entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares." Abraham was
a man of faith, and the first thing that he did when he saw three strangers was to offer
them food and drink. Genesis 18:1-5 says, "And the LORD appeared unto him in the
plains of Mamre: and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day; And he lift up his
eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet
them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground, And said, My Lord, if now I
have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant: Let a little
water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree: And
I will fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort ye your hearts; after that ye shall pass on:
for therefore are ye come to your servant. And they said, So do, as thou hast said."
Leviticus 19:34 says, "But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as
one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land
of Egypt: I am the LORD your God."
If the
Lord places such an emphasis on being kind to strangers, would the requirement not be even
higher to visitors that are fellow Christians? Closed Communion reminds me if how Simon
the Pharisee treated Jesus. Luke 7:36-50 says, "And one of the Pharisees desired him
that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat.
And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat
in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment, And stood at his feet
behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the
hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment. Now when the
Pharisee which had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if he
were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him:
for she is a sinner. And Jesus answering said unto him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto
thee. And he saith, Master, say on. There was a certain creditor which had two debtors:
the one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty. And when they had nothing to pay, he
frankly forgave them both. Tell me therefore, which of them will love him most? Simon
answered and said, I suppose that he, to whom he forgave most. And he said unto him, Thou
hast rightly judged. And he turned to the woman, and said unto Simon, Seest thou this
woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet: but she hath
washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head. Thou gavest me no
kiss: but this woman since the time I came in hath not ceased to kiss my feet. My head
with oil thou didst not anoint: but this woman hath anointed my feet with ointment.
Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but
to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little. And he said unto her, Thy sins are
forgiven. And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this
that forgiveth sins also? And he said to the woman, Thy faith hath saved thee; go in
peace." Sadly, it seems common for those pastors and churches who practice
Closed Communion, to look down upon other pastors, missionaries, and churches that do not
restrict it after their manner.
In Christ, have not all
Christians received refreshment from the Lord? Acts 3:19 says, "Repent ye therefore,
and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall
come from the presence of the Lord." To deny another Christian visiting in a church
service the right to partake of the Lords Supper, is a very uncourteous practice.
Has he not also received refreshment from the Lord when his sins were forgiven? Has he
also not as much right in Christ as we? Is he unworthy, because he is not of our group, to
remember the broken body and blood of the Lord that was shed for him, as well as for us?
Jesus
Himself said that He would come in and sup with us, if we would but open the door.
Revelation 3:20 says, "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my
voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with
me." For a church to say to another Christian, "No, you are not welcome to sup
with us as we observe the Lords Supper," is uncourteous, and going beyond what
the Bible teaches.

Previous Questions and Answers
Ask A Question